Sunday, August 19, 2007

Bindaas bolo

I did my post graduation in a co-education college. This was a college where there were a lot of rowdy elements and so the boys in our class and particularly those in our group generally made sure that we were escorted until we were safely inside our buses. They usually did it with great subtlety but we were not blind and at times we found this terribly annoying and male chauvinistic.We found them annoying in some other ways too. For example, we had no problem discussing "adult" subjects - we were all adults after all - or sharing "adult" jokes. And no one thought anything about it. Then one day for some activity we had to work with students from another department and some of the guys were very funny and many of the jokes were a little too dirty but they were very funny and we laughed out loud. The boys in our gang were visibly displeased and on our way to the bus`stop we got lectured on how to act with dignity. So we asked our classmates what they were upset about and then they said "good girls are not supposed to laugh at dirty jokes!" What hypocrisy? Weren't these very boys sharing such jokes with us all the time? So what was different today? Apparently it was ok to do that with your inner circle but a girl who shared such jokes with strangers was considered "loose." "We know what those boys would speak about you because we do the same about girls who don't know us and laugh at our dirty jokes!"
We were furious about this hypocrisy and we told the boys to stay away from us thereafter. They apologised the next day and things became normal although we made it clear that we were perfectly capable of "taking care" of ourselves without bodyguards and moral police.
I think this kind of hypocrisy is at the root of all moral policing societies. "How is it Ok for you to indulge in one type of behaviour and consider yourself "mature" while someone else indulging in the same is guilty of bad behaviour? Where does one draw the line?

We have all heard of or known boys who party with girls but when it comes to their marriage they want a "good girl from the village!" We know boys who are not virgins themselves but want to marry a vestal virgin. I saw a film recently where the lead man says that he wants to marry a girl who is rooted in our culture and he falls for a girl who fits the description but in all the dream song sequences he visualises her in the sexiest clothing with very bold dance movements which would shame a pop star from the west.A fine example of our hypocrisy - I wonder if this was a deliberate tongue-in-cheek technique employed by the director.

I appreciate the view that the subject of sex should be handled with subtlety and sensitivity as it can easily degenerate into realm of the crude and vulgar and this is precisely why these explicit jokes are termed "dirty". Trouble is that Sex is an essential aspect of life and we cannot pretend that "good people" do not indulge in it! I think the best way to approach the subject is to demystify it and look at it as a normal part of life - neither profane or sacred. I am sure that would get rid of much of sexual abuse and unhealthy practices which are a result of sexual repression or the taboos associated with talking normally about sex.

One reason for the increase in HIV positive people is unsafe sex and the failure to use condoms. Most people are shy to go and ask for condoms. There was a campaign called Condom Bindaas Bol campaign a few years ago to encourage people to say the word "condom". Some of their findings were outrageously funny and fine examples of how we complicate simple things with our hypocrisy:
One was that the consumer feels uncomfortable that the shopkeeper knows that he would use it that night!
This one is even better: The consumer is uncomfortable because the shopkeeper knows his wife and he wonders what the shopkeeper might imagine of when he buys a condom!

Ok so sex is bad and we are good people and we don't indulge in it. So explain this: we are the second most populous nation in the world soon on our way to the top.And we have alarming increase in HIV positive people.

It is this same kind of hypocrisy that stands in the way of introduction of sex education in schools. Children do not need to be "taught" about sex , they will learn about it when the time comes. And while we are waiting for the right time, the number of "children" who seek abortions is on the rise.According to this report
According to a study conducted by Indian Council of Medical Research, 17 per cent of the 1.4 million teenage abortions that take place every year in developing countries happen in India.
Of the approximately 2,45,000 teenage abortions that take place in India every year, 36,700 happen in the urban towns of Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Bangalore.
And the National Capital contributes to half of that figure.
Top abortionists in the city say, "at least" 1,500 teenage abortions take place in the Capital every month.
That's 18,000 every year!


Medical experts say that early sexual life leads to high incidence of sexually transmitted infections. One in 20 adolescent contracts this infection every year, and half of all cases of HIV/AIDS is among the youth below 25 years.
And yet we say no to sex education in schools.

Times are changing. Lifestyles have changed. Our society is no longer so insulated that it can stay safe inside our traditional norms. TV exposes our children to more open cultures where sex is accepted as a reality and very normal part of life. The internet gives them access to a lot of subjects which are taboo in our society. The more we try to keep these subjects in the domain of the "forbidden" the more children are curious to know about them and even worse "experiment".
It is time we learnt to see reality as it is and ensured that they are informed rather than experiment with equally ill- informed peers and suffer the consequences.
It is time we learnt to say words like "sex" and "condom" without inhibition. And more important , not be scandalised if our children ask to know about them. They already "know" that storks don't bring babies so tell them in a way they can understand and be safe.

23 comments:

Altoid said...

:) I know a good friend of mine who, when he was looking for a bride, would point at me and say "you convent educated city bred girls are too outspoken...I prefer a simple (mute) homely girl from the village". Most times this would only amuse me to hear, cos this was his way of saying he wanted a good looking doormat and a maid.

Another story that who he married was no where close to being the homemaker he wanted, but then village girl she certainly is.

Denial seems to be the genetic characteristic of Indian men...its going to be a while before its removed.

A.R.Malik said...

Re entrenched-establishment attitudes towards sex ed...MM Joshi, the former education minister was recently fuming in Tehelka that it'd lead children into "believeing that sex is a natural activity".

Go figure.

Anonymous said...

Trouble is that Sex is an essential aspect of life and we cannot pretend that "good people" do not indulge in it! I think the best way to approach the subject is to demystify it and look at it as a normal part of life - neither profane or sacred. I am sure that would get rid of much of sexual abuse and unhealthy practices which are a result of sexual repression or the taboos associated with talking normally about sex.


Where i agree with u on certain issues, how to explain the the sexual abuse cases in US/UK where sex is not a taboo sub? i think the root cause lies elsewhere.. and no I dont know where it lies..

Swarna said...

An aside about answering kid's queries on where babies come from: Here's a sincere tip from a mom who faced the question "How do your internal organs know you're married?". She says: Be prepared for differently-framed queries...

Swati said...

Hypocrites we are ..birthing a baby is noble ..but sex is dirty ..HA HA!
We too had those body guard type of friends in college ..who consider you as their copyrights

Usha said...

Altoid: Denial is one and the other is stereotyping.
"good girls don't so this or that" forcing people into a hypocritical mode.

Abhilash: Ahahahaha....The minister needs some "education" it seems! So does he believe that children are given by god a la the pandavas in the Mahabharat.
Or as a young girl I was given to believe that good people didnt "do" sex for pleasure - it was strictly for procreation!

Swarna:Oh yes, kids are no longer dumb. And they don't buy the stupid stories we did.

Swati: Yes, it was Ok to do the dirty act only for propogation, else it is dirty!
OH, those guys can be irritating - I am sure they keep their wives and daughters under lock and key!

Usha said...

Anon:That is why I said much of the sexual abuse - not all.
I guess human mind is perverse enough to abuse anything. And there is always a fascination to try out the forbidden and taboo.Demystifying it can solve part of the problem.
I agree there are other causes for abuse - perhaps psychology will give the answer.

Hip Grandma said...

i feel that it is better to gradually introduce children to their sexuality and discuss the matter like any other lesson.Recently I read that the Jharkhand govt had tried to introduce the a chapter in sex education and in an effort to make children aware of high risk situations replaced the word sex by 'it' and ended up making children more curious and confused. a survey conducted on high risk behavior in the steel city revealed that college students were the most vulnereable more so because they were either ignorant or possessed insufficient knowledge.It is time we stopped behaving as if only western culture allows such behavior.At the peak of one's reproductive capacity hormones do their job and the situation needs to be tackled intelligently.

namvor said...

i feel sex education is far too important to be left to anyone except parents. after all, who knows the kids better? it would be foolish not to as the current bunch of kids have more sources of misguided info than we can even imagine.

dont always need to give them more info than they ask - stick to the question and answer straight. if you dont make a big deal of it, neither will they. also teach them to respect their bodies.

i think and hope that should do teh trick.

Something to Say said...

Well said usha. We're having a similar debate in the US. Docs are insisting that every girl below 9 receive a vaccine that will prevent cervical cancer(wich we're now told is caused by a virus). One of the leading causes of cervical cancer is unprotected sex. People fear that if girls are given this vaccine - they are more likely to indulge in unprotected sex.
While education about dangers of unprotected sex is one step to take - I believe the vaccine is a protective net which always be exercised.
And while you have painted the Indian perspective so well, I have often wondered that in the US where education and the society being so open to discuss sex and its repercussions - one still gets to see and hear about teenage pregnancies and HIV. And then I wonder, really what is the answer to this?

Usha said...

Hipgran:Well said.

namvor:I am sure many of the educated parents know how to introduce the children to the subject in an appropriate way. But what about those parents who have had no education and who do not know how to explain this in a scientific manner to their kids. Trained teachers and appropriate material can help them understand it better.

StS: I do not know the answer but one guess is that rebellion and risk taking could be at the base of this kind of behaviour. Does this happen in poorer and less educated sections and more so in cases where family environment isn't stable?

DotMom said...

nice post. I think, as Indians, we need to face reality and loosen up abit..

Lavs said...
This post has been removed by the author.
Lavs said...

Bravo! What a post. I am for including sex education in schools. But looking at the way some of them oppose it, one might think that they are going to teach the actual process with practicals!! Sex education should teach teenagers the various parts of human body involved in reproduction. Learning it properly is much better than learning it from friends and strangers. I have read some articles in which people have mentioned that including sex education in schools in against our culture. To such people, I would like to point out that what culture and traditions will remain when more than half our population is whipped out by AIDS.

choxbox said...

usha, why does one need to be educated to teach about the birds and the bees? i mean if you have brought the kids into the world then you know how its done right?!

i say this because i remember reading somewhere that in certain african tribes the custom is that newly-weds go into a tent with sort of loosely woven sides. all the kids in the tribe are made to stand outside and watch whatever is going on inside. this is how they are taught about life. while i dont advocate this method :)) (though that is pretty much what is happening thanks to the stuff on TV/movies now, at least these tribal chaps have no hypocrisy), i think that being uneducated may not necessarily mean prudishness and vice versa.

namvor

Usha said...

Dotmom, Lavs: Agree totally.

Namvor/choxbox:The education is not just about what happens in the act.Nature can teach you that.
It is about hygiene,safety, sexual transmission of diseases and how to stay protected etc.These are not of major concern to birds and bees because they only indulge in sex for propogation unlike humans and dolphins who do it for pleasure.

WhatsInAName said...

I agree that sex education is a must for kids but when, how? This is one topic which has been bothering me too! Like once my daughter, when she was quite small.. asked me after seeing something on TV... How did she get pregnant, she is not married na!!! What to answer to that?

choxbox said...

ok point taken.

Usha said...

WIN:When? Whenever your child begins to get curious about these - have age- appropriate answers which are true and not fabricated.
How old is your daughter?
First of all I would try and make her understand that marriage is a social institution which has no biological validity.
Child bearing is a biological function. human bodies become ready for such functions as a process of biological development - just like a kitten becomes a cat and a puppy becomes a dog just by growing physiologically. Just like dogs and cats do not go through a marriage, it is possible for an adult male and adult female humans also to have children without marrying. They understand easily when you use animal life as example.
Human life is a little more en complicated than plants and animals We live as a family. We do not make children and go away leaving them. So we have the concept of marriage. Marriage is important to ensure that the child has a good father and a good mother and they have the ability to take care of them as a family.(If you want to enforce the value of marriage. or if can talk about love and commitment if the child is old enough)
If the girl is still very young you can just say that since it is possible for an adult male and an adult female to have children even without marriage, boys and girls should not behave like married people even before they are married. Then they might get children whom they are not old enough to take care of . If they do not marry the child will not have a father. All this is not good for the child or the parents of that child.
It is perfectly alright for a boy and girl to be good friends, they should not get too close physically. It is also possible to get diseases from physical contact - so one should be careful..
If she is older of course you can talk a little more in detail..
Whatever the age of the child,keep the dialogue open and tell her that if she is faced with confusing situations, she can always feel free to come and talk to you. tell her it is natural to feel such feelings at a certain age and there is no need to feel guilty about it.

Choxbox: :)

WhatsInAName said...

hey Usha :)
Thats a brilliant answer and apt too. Will keep in mind and explain accordingly. My younger daughter is all of 10, and she was the one who was curious .... and this was some years back. I didnt know what to answer then.
Its so very difficult! Parenting :)

Mahadevan said...

Bertrand Russell, put it aptly

"You are likely to act wisely when you are instructed than when you are ignorant'. Sexual knowledge, rightly imparted at the appropriate age, would be an aid.

We try to conceal and it leads to curiosity and curiocity leads to experimentation and experimentation demands a price at times a heavier one.

Mahadevan said...

Bertrand Russell, put it aptly

"You are likely to act wisely when you are instructed than when you are ignorant'. Sexual knowledge, rightly imparted at the appropriate age, would be an aid.

We try to conceal and it leads to curiosity and curiocity leads to experimentation and experimentation demands a price at times a heavier one.

choxbox said...

clap clap clap (for your answer to WIN's q)